NR505 Area of interest

Week 1: Area of Interest in NP

Select an issue in nurse practitioner (NP) practice that is of interest to you and in which you would like to see a practice change occur. Conduct a review of literature to see what is currently known about the topic. In 2-3 paragraphs describe the scope and relevance of the issue and your recommended change. Provide reference support from at least three-four outside scholarly sources to support your ideas. References no older than 5 years

NR505NP Scholarly Discussion Rubric

You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

NR505NP Scholarly Discussion Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Course Knowledge _5946

Answers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week.

view longer descriptionAnswers the initial discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the concepts for the week.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

15.0 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding.

blank

Edit rating Delete rating

14.0 to >12.0 pts

Very Good

Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding

_6391

Edit rating Delete rating

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Satisfactory

Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding.

_9772

Edit rating Delete rating

8.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question with little depth and lack of application of experiences, knowledge, or understanding.

_254

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Does not address the initial question(s).

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 15.0 pts

—

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement in Meaningful Dialogue With Peers and Faculty _9902

The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.

view longer descriptionThe student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

10.0 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.

_2051

Edit rating Delete rating

9.0 to >8.0 pts

Very Good

Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.

_1790

Edit rating Delete rating

8.0 to >5.0 pts

Satisfactory

Responds to a student peer and/or course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion.

_2272

Edit rating Delete rating

5.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Responds to a student peer or course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion.

_5659

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No response post to another student or course faculty.

_5169

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 10.0 pts

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Evidence _3605

Assigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is:
1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years.

view longer descriptionAssigned readings OR online lesson AND at least one outside scholarly source are included. The scholarly source is:<br/> 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

15.0 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lessons AND • at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.*

_8035

Edit rating Delete rating

14.0 to >12.0 pts

Very Good

Integrates evidence from: • no assigned readings OR online lesson is included • at least one outside scholarly source is included. Sources are credited.*

_1235

Edit rating Delete rating

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Satisfactory

Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lesson • no outside scholarly source is included. Sources are credited.*

_6547

Edit rating Delete rating

8.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Integrates evidence from: • assigned readings OR online lesson • no outside scholarly source is included. Sources are not credited.*

_3229

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Does not integrate any evidence.

_231

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 15.0 pts

—

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Communication _4427

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (0–1 error in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

_8976

Edit rating Delete rating

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Very Good

Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (2–3 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

_7976

Edit rating Delete rating

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Satisfactory

Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized (3–4 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

_1214

Edit rating Delete rating

2.0 to >0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized (5-6 errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

_6128

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional, or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the post (7 or more errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).

_5325

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 5.0 pts

—

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Citation _2725

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5.0 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

References have complete information as required by APA (0-1 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors).

_4930

Edit rating Delete rating

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Very Good

References have most information as required by APA (2 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors).

_579

Edit rating Delete rating

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Satisfactory

References have some information as required by APA (3 errors). In-text citations included for all references, AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors).

_5548

Edit rating Delete rating

2.0 to >0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory

References have some information as required by APA (4 errors). In-text citations included for all references AND references are included for all in-text citations (0 errors).

_8749

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

References missing 5 or more elements AND/OR In-text citations missing OR final references not included for in-text citations.

_8728

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 5.0 pts

—

Continue to order Get a quote

Calculate the price of your order

Type of paper needed:

Pages:

550 words

Academic level:

We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM

Total price:

$26

The price is based on these factors:

Academic level

Number of pages

Urgency

Basic features

Free title page and bibliography
Unlimited revisions
Plagiarism-free guarantee
Money-back guarantee
24/7 support

On-demand options

Writer’s samples
Part-by-part delivery
Overnight delivery
Copies of used sources
Expert Proofreading

Paper format

275 words per page
12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
Double line spacing
Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

error: Content is protected !!